Try this without a stutter!
Mr. See and Mr. Soar were old friends.
See owned a saw and Soar owned a seesaw.
Now See's saw sawed Soar's seesaw before Soar saw See, which made Soar sore.
See owned a saw and Soar owned a seesaw.
Now See's saw sawed Soar's seesaw before Soar saw See, which made Soar sore.
Had Soar seen See's saw before See saw Soar's seesaw, then See's saw would not have sawed Soar's seesaw.
But See saw Soar and Soar's seesaw before Soar saw
But See saw Soar and Soar's seesaw before Soar saw
See's saw, so See's saw sawed Soar's seesaw.
It was a shame to let See see Soar so sore just because See's saw sawed Soar's seesaw !!!
It was a shame to let See see Soar so sore just because See's saw sawed Soar's seesaw !!!
I am not saying I am fluent in English,and I also admit that mine is worst in the whole blogosphere,but I did utter that para without any stutter.
ReplyDelete:) he he he :) Wow !!
ReplyDeletejiji i read it so amny times widout ni mistake:P
ReplyDeletend i fwded teh email to my boss ghalti sey:(
A duel was fought between Alexander Shott and John Nott. Nott was shot and Shott was not. In this case it was better to be Shott than Nott. Some said that Nott was not shot. But Shott says that he shot Nott.
ReplyDeleteIt may be that the shot Shott shot, shot Nott, or it may be possible that the shot Shott shot, shot Shott himself. We think, however, that the shot Shott shot, shot not Shott, but Nott.
Anyway it is hard to tell which was shot and which was not.
hehhehehhehe
Desi Version
ReplyDeleteChandu ki Chachi ne chandu ka chacha ko Chandni Chonk me chandi ke chamach se chatni chatai.